September 1, 2021

*** This hand was suggested by Ras2829
16-18*  ?
44%
44%
35%
35%
11%
11%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total votes: 243
Rosemarie44

Joined: March 2016 (2310 votes)

Wednesday 3:18 AM
What are the choices here, 5-8 or 8-9 to opponent? Value of 5-8 is 6.39 points and 8-9 is 5.89 points as a comparison. I like the double run here. Chance for 16 points and starting with 8 points rather than 7.
Rosemarie44 says: Crib values are Ras's statistics.
JQT

Joined: October 2008 (4561 votes)

Wednesday 3:20 AM
We are Pone and we appear to be headed to well beyond the First Street Par Hole 18 by completion of This Deal.

Our Opponent, however, is currently the Dealer and is right AT that Par Hole 18, so the Dealer tentatively has secured having the Positional Advantage at this time. You might say we're 'Walking on Eggshells' here.

Therefore, unless the Dealer "stumbles" badly and soon, our REAL "target" is to somehow reach the Second Street Par Hole 44 by completion of This Deal, and that goal lies a very distant Twenty-Eight Holes away, definitely out of our immediate reach.

We have almost "too good of a hand" for our own good, it seems, a problem I referenced very recently on these very pages. There are two different Double Runs, which entail giving away either Toss (5 8) or Toss (5 J), so we shall definitely consider the former, and certainly avoid the latter.

We also have one very interesting "hybrid" solution: Keep (5 9 T J) and Toss (8 9), which sends a somewhat-less-dangerous discard 'over the board,' while enabling us to begin with Seven Points, only One Point less than either of the aforementioned Double Runs! I am often very fond of these "hybrid" solutions in Cribbage. Interesting!

Toss (5 8) has a Crib Value of 6.30, and Toss (8 9) has a Crib Value of 5.83 Points (Schell). Therefore, these two discards only seem to differ by just 0.47, or less than half a point! The averages however don't always actually reveal the true element of risk; but on the surface, it seems we would be 'giving up' just half a point in order to retain a FULL EXTRA POINT. What's going on here?

It turns out that Toss (8 9) varies quite a bit, depending upon which chart or what source one consults! Surprisingly, this discard is NOT listed among those which RAS has found that his Empirical Value differs significantly from the commonly-used charts. But let's at least look at what we can find about this apparent and amorphous anomaly.

As far as Toss (8 9) is concerned, as I said earlier, Schell regards it as worth 5.83 Points. Hessel, however, lists it as 5.97 Points, and Colvert has it sitting at 5.7 Points. RAS lists it at 5.89 Points, right in the middle. And C. Liam Brown places it at just 5.4 Points! Whoa: hold on there!

I believe that the Halscrib Program and its lineage of follow-on products has always used a kind of "Special Sauce" for its assessment of Crib Values, so while it's not exclusively relying upon or using any particular person or chart (that I know of), in at least its method, it is most akin to Schell, whose chart is actually a Composite (or "average of other averages") all thrust into a sort-of melting pot of ideas!

And this matters greatly today: because if we just look at Schell's numbers, the Toss (8 9) discard looks like it's possibly a bit dangerous; but if we use a more "modern" source like C. Liam Brown, it becomes much more of a "manageable" risk, especially when being compared to Toss (5 8).

Toss (8 9) poses some amount of risk, there's no doubt about that! And this means that even our "safe" idea is maybe not too safe, after all. And while Keep (5 9 T J) could in fact do very well after Eleven Cuts (555, 99, TTT, JJJ), about half of these would likely boost the Enemy Crib as well. And will it even matter, this early in the game? (I think it will, because after all: points are points.)

After Keep (9 9 T J), now we get appreciable help from Fifteen Cuts (555, 6666, 99, TTT, JJJ), and yet of these, only the 5 Card Cut really portends to help our Opponent, implying that it could seriously damage us. Thus, after Toss (5 8), we definitely lack what I like to call "Five Card Cut Insurance" today. Make a note of that.

It seems to be a manageable risk to Toss (5 8) today, but is it? I tend to fall onto the "safe" side of the fence and camp, and so I'll 'hedge' my bet today and Toss (8 9), but I realize that I could still get burned, and look bad in the process. Trust me: I'll get over it.

After the 3h Cut, which only adds One Lousy Point to our Hand, let's Lead a Lovely Jack, which is Bright Red, just like the Last Peach of Summer (a Peach that perhaps magically matches the color of your Hair?), a word which rhymes with PEAR, which is a homophone of PAIR, which is what those who retained the Double Run will be thinking of as they Lead from the 9 Card PAIR (and you thought I would never get there!). Whew, the end, almost.

Four years ago, someone from a much newer and younger generation than my own covered "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin, a hugely-popular hit from their fourth album at the time, which was released back in 1971, the year I became a teenager.

Nothing unusual so far: that is, until you discover that the performer here in 2017 is Jadyn Rylee, a young girl from the nearest "big city" to me, Toronto Ontario, Canada; and it's now been viewed and listened to over Eight Million Times! But maybe, just maybe, you've not heard it yet.

Oh, and I almost forgot to mention: at the time of her performance, Jadyn Rylee had apparently just reached the tender age ... of eleven. https://youtu.be/_r3asKw_ghw
Eolus619 says: John….” And will it even matter, this early in the game? (I think it will, because after all: points are points.) ” AGREE… if the who deals first advantage enjoyed by current dealer is not flipped by CPZ #3…big problems for “us”
fentesk says: I believe you're pointing in this direction in your write-up, but just in case I'll note explicitly that C. Liam is dynamically calculating the crib value based on the rest of the hand (his exact method I can't tell, though he mentions running a large data set until values stabalize. Putting in different cards will show different values for 8-9. I think Ras's general rule was to decrease the crib value by ~0.16 for each additional card you hold that scores with that discard, which here would be the other 9 and 10.
fentesk says: I don't have Ras's values for frequencies of how these discards score, but looked at my calculated values based on his discard frequencies. They show for 5-8, 0-2 = 7.5%, 0-4 = 34.7%, 8+ = 32.4%, 12+ = 6.6%. For 8-9, 0-2 = 26.5%, 0-4 = 47.7%, 8+ = 26.7%, 12+ = 12.2%. I read those to say that 5-8 is going to be a medium scoring discard often, while 8-9 has a greater chance of blowing up 12+. It seems the decision today may in part include how large of a standard deviation you want to deal with for your discard. 5-8 is going to score much closer to its average each time, while 8-9 can swing wildly. With 8-9 you at least have a chance for a zero-point crib (5.3%) while you know it can't happen for 5-8.
mrob2199

Joined: February 2009 (1765 votes)

Wednesday 3:32 AM
As Rosemarie said the decision is the 58 or 89 discard-the 5910j starts with 1 point less but I prefer throwing 89 to 85 here-it appears as if 85 would be fairly innocuous but as Rosemarie noted above the 58 scores .5 higher on average-but Rob you’re giving up 1 point in hand retention and only getting back .5 in crib reduction-you’re down half a point-yes but I feel the 89 discard average is skewered by a few huge cribs-the 58 will get a solid 6 points just about every time-also the 89 discard in this particular hand is influenced by the negative delta of the 9 and 10 we already hold in our hand-so the normal average of 5.89 should be reduced today
james500

Joined: June 2013 (4438 votes)

Wednesday 3:57 AM
A reluctant 8-9.
JQT says: A reluctant 8-9, given away in a recalcitrant manner. (I need to work on my brevity ; - )
jmudge says: Reluctant! I learned a new word today. :)
jmudge says: And I copied the wrong word! :D
dec

Joined: April 2008 (6948 votes)

Wednesday 4:06 AM
Those nines can be a real pain sometimes but I will break up the most points and still have chances at twelve and more. dec
Gougie00

Joined: March 2008 (6263 votes)

Wednesday 4:51 AM
keeping the double run until someone convinces me otherwise
Jazzselke

Joined: March 2009 (2921 votes)

Wednesday 5:30 AM
Similar hand configuration from Saturday but position is more akin to yesterday. Tempted to keep the double run, but why give up a sure 2 points with 58. Almost offset by the danger of 89 as 78 is the most common crib throw. The deciding factor may be if you are familiar with your opponent. Some players favor retaining the 5 for pegging. For today I will avoid tossing a sure 2 points, and agree with Jame's phrase, a reluctant 89.
JQT says: Very Nice Summary!
Eolus619 says: Dan ..I agree with JQT.. I add that, while some very good players do not focus on board position early , you have often pointed out that it should be given more attention ..yesterday and today’s scores are indicative of the risk of not appreciating the CPZ #1 scores…not doing do may easily compound a player’s disadvantage in #2 & #3
Eolus619 says: whoops not doing do.. should read not doing so
Jazzselke says: Thank you both. But a razor-thin difference IMO.
travelingman2019 says: I cannot see dumping 89 into the opponents crib, no matter what the position.....that has too many openings to a possible 20-24 crib.....85 provides the least amount of damage and if the cut goes your way, the 16 offsets the possible 12 that could come from 85 toss.........
MiketheExpert

Joined: April 2021 (1318 votes)

Wednesday 5:34 AM
Tough call today. It is unfortunate that dealer seems to have completely gained the advantage after the first deal of the game, and yet I will still be forced to throw dangerous cards in his crib. However, keeping a double run is nothing to scoff at, as we have performed at least average ourselves after the first hand. I was debating between throwing (8 9) offsuit and keeping 1 less pt, or (5 8), however (5 J) was out of the question. I eventually decided on keeping the double run and full 8 pts, as the (5 8) usually don't work all that well together, even if another face or 5 comes up on the cut, this still helps my hand, and hopefully it will prevent a "huge" crib score from happening...So let's try for the 16 or possible maximum of 17 here and go full steam ahead, because that seems to be our best way out here...Leading the 9 from the pair.
MiketheExpert says: Well it looks like only 16 is possible, as that 10H is right in my hand....oh well, still not enough for me to change my mind :)
MiketheExpert says: This is also "feels" like one of those situations that could be "ripe" for a (7 8) throw --- I'm envisioning a low double run with a couple of out of place mid-cards, such as (6 9) or (7 8). So I'd rather give up a "modest" crib of maybe 6 points than risk a "barn burner" here.
zeke76

Joined: August 2018 (1531 votes)

Wednesday 5:46 AM
It's close and others have outlined the merits of each toss better than I ever could.
mfetchCT425

Joined: February 2009 (1694 votes)

Wednesday 6:06 AM
Favor the 8-9 toss slightly more than 5-8 today with some negative delta working for us with a 9 and 10 already out of circulation.
scottcrib says: Congrats on the grand slam last night. Way to end the month!
Eolus619 says: additional congrats … Mike currently sits #3 overall on ecribbage…there are only seven player rated over 2000 in the entire ecribbage universe.
mfetchCT425 says: Thank you Scott and Bruce! Had some beautiful cuts last night and at the right, which really helps.
mfetchCT425 says: Should say “at the right time…” above. Thx again.
Ras2829 says: HImfetchCt425: Terrific and timing is so key in this game. Some folks call that shit-house luck. Perhaps timing is a manifestation of luck though see little correlation to the proverbial outhouse.
mfetchCT425 says: Thanks Ras, lol. When playing doubles as a 12 year old kid with my mom, grandma, and grandpa (the boys vs the girls), my grandpa would say, after my grandma pulled a big hand with a nice cut, that she could fall into a barrel of crap and still come out smelling like a rose. We would play cribbage all through the night, even on a school night! :-)
SallyAnn3 says: Congrats on your ACC Gold/GRAND SLAM last night, Mike. I'm glad it happened when I was the TD. The other lounge also had a GS!
mfetchCT425 says: Thanks Sally! Great job as always directing the tournament.
SallyAnn3 says: Thanks, haha, but a lot of things went wrong, so I am glad that I could hide them well :)
usacoder

Joined: August 2019 (1135 votes)

Wednesday 6:24 AM
It's a double run. Nothing more to say.
Eolus619

Joined: June 2020 (1855 votes)

Wednesday 7:06 AM
The board position puzzle from yesterday and today has been an eye opener to something I should have paid a lot more attention too…that is ….if the cycles prevail ..who gets to deal first @ the very last. ..fentesk pointed this out yesterday….it is a hard thing for me to do to extrapolate 7-8-9 hands in advance ( I can do it for the next CPZ ) all the while deciding on my discard. So I ask myself, what am I trying to do long and short. My answer is ..I am trying to flip who deals first advantage current dealer has heading toward CPZ #2. In a perfect cribbage world ,I would want to be @ 42+ & have my opponent be 41(-) . That says to me I am not tossing a five to the crib. Toss the 8-9 ( good reasons given above as to why ) and see if I can accomplish the who gets 1st deal flip. If not in #2 then a must for #3.
scottcrib

Joined: August 2019 (2163 votes)

Wednesday 7:26 AM
It looks like we are all playing the cribbage stock market today by
seeing which keep has the most return on investment and which toss has the least impact on the bottom line.
Fender Bass

Joined: July 2021 (373 votes)

Wednesday 8:04 AM
Keep the double run and minimize the crib damage.
SallyAnn3

Joined: March 2020 (1330 votes)

Wednesday 1:39 PM
The 9-9 and 6-9 toss don't scare me, but the 8/9 always does!
Coeurdelion

Joined: October 2007 (5766 votes)

Wednesday 3:07 PM
I think it's between 9-10-10-J (5-8) and 5-9C-10-J (8-10):

9-9-10-J: 8pts - 6¼pts (Schell: 6.30) = +1¾pts

5-9C-10-J: 7pts - 5¾pts (Schell: 5.83) = +2¼pts

Potential:

9-9-10-J: Improves with 555, 6666, 888, 99, 101010, JJJ, QQQQ = 22 cuts = 22/46 = 47.8% up to 12/15/16pts with 555, 6666, 99, 101010, JJJ = 15 cuts. Plus 11 hearts for 1pt extra for his nob = 11/46 = 0.24pt.

5-9C-10-J: Improves with AAAA, 555, 6666, 888, 99 + 14xXs = 30 cuts = 30/46 = 65.2% up to 10/12/13/14pts with 555, 99, 101010, JJJ, QQQQ = 15 cuts. Plus 11 hearts for 1pt extra for his nob = 11/46 = 0.24pt

Position:

Opponent has reached 1st street positional hole but we have scored 16pts so still retain some positional advantage. I think I'll play cautious offense.

Pegging:

I think both hands will peg well but I think 5-9C-10-J will have the edge.

Summary:

9-9-10-J starts with ½pt more but has fewer cuts for improvement but has 15 cuts for 12-16pts compared to 15 cuts for 10-14pts for 5-9C-10-J. So I'll throw one of the lower scoring 5-x throws 5-8.
HalscribCLX

Joined: February 2008 (5791 votes)

Wednesday 3:13 PM
At 16-18* playing an Optimal strategy for the pegging the dynamic expected averages and Win/Loss %s are:

_______________Our
Offense___Hand_Pegs__Crib__Total____W8 %____W9 %
5-9C-10-J__9.61+1.28+(-5.18)=5.71____46.4____44.7
9-9-10-J__10.50+1.04+(-6.20)=5.34____47.1____42.5

Offense_______L8 %____L9 %
5-9C-10-J______45.9____34.3
9-9-10-J_______49.0____37.2

5-9C-10-J is better for expected averages by 0.37pt. and is slightly better for Win %s and appreciably lower for Loss %s. So I'll select 8-9S to discard.

After the 3H cut I'll lead the 10 and play Defense:

Lead________Dealer's Pegging Pts.
10________________(-2.49)
J_________________(-2.53)
9_________________(-2.76)
5_________________(-3.32)
MiketheExpert says: I am surprised that results are showing crib differential to be over a point with the 2 throws here. (-5.18) is perhaps affected by the negative delta of having another 9 an 10? But I would think the (5-8) also experiences some negative delta with the the 2 9's and face cards in your hand, albeit not as much due to higher # of cards which will improve it. Also thought pegging using an optimal strategy (net pegs) would be a bit closer...once again, it seems like either one could definitely be a close possibility depending on "personal" style/viewpoint here.
MiketheExpert says: hmm...it seems like it is listed as "our" total pegs (offense) rather than optimal as HAL originally suggested.....?
Ras2829

Joined: November 2008 (5496 votes)

Wednesday 8:59 PM
HalscribCLX shows all the numbers with which I agree, choice of offense, offense, and switching to defense with the lead of the 10. Let me share my thought processes with you. Looking at the pegs, seemingly close, dealer has a sizeable advantage needing next deal in2nd Street CPZ 43-47, 25 holes away. N/d is in the middle of nowhere, looking to deal form hole 25 or 26 on average. So when considering that, am thinking best thing can do is to shave a few holes from dealer advantage. That's offense! Then n/d looks at the 6 cards, thinks in terms of combined values rather than hand score alone, can't give up the five spot with any card. So that comes down to an offense choice (pegs, hand score, less crib score) 5-9-10-J represents the best alternative. Once seeing the starter card, knowing that it adds only a single point to my hand, downshift to defense to include the pegging. That indicates lead the 10, the middle card of the three card sequence, minimizing chance of dealer to pick up a run by n/d holding consecutive cards. That decision to avoid pegs also determines the second card played. Get rid of the lone five if it appears reasonably safe to do so. Leading the mid cad of a three card sequence is good pegging strategy for most three card sequences. The consider the remaining card which poses the greatest danger for dealer pegs (those will usually look like a lone A, 2, 3, 4 or 5). The five is so key as it scores with A-9, 2-8, 3-4, 3-7, 4-6, 5-5, 6-7, and all those X-pointers. A single Ace or deuce is nearly as bad as small cards often stack up near end of pegging sequence. So though single trey or four can get hung up, the n/d Ace or deuce is more often squeezed in for 31-4, 31-8, even an occasional 31-14.